RushCars24ID

 Quote: Katana bs

This is so much better than crack Yo neck version because c Y n version has a flaws in the seats

Speaking of Crack Yo Neck...

@Mit_Subi_1992 - I think you're optional to add this note to that description and Readme text whatever you wanted to, but IMO, this is not necessary anyway; there were used to be some previous attempts of lore-friendly NA1 NSXes in SA, which you need to put that note for future viewers while providing differences between them and your mod (since there were pros and cons between the mods).

IIRC, there's one by Burbalade, and later one by Crack Yo' Neck/craccosan. The latter was taken down (but brought back up again by some friendly users) after CYN/craccosan got harrassed and decided to retire from modding, deleting all of his mods and closes his GTAForums workshop.

 Quote: Bibas

For all of my life, I've been searching for this infernus!

Speaking of "this Infernus!"...

@Mit_Subi_1992 - I'm sorry but just wanna let you know because you've forgotten this detail in this description (and probably in the Readme text); SA already has a Honda/Acura NSX NA1 in the base game, it's the Infernus. Why you left that Infernus note out? When I first saw this and read its description, I almost gonna rant "Hey hey, but there's already the Infernus! The freaking Infernus!", marking my confusion to this. Ruling out the Jester name is already a great choice, which I agree, BUT you totally forgot that the Infernus actually exists. You need to insert the Infernus note in that description and its Readme to avoid further confusions.

The name 'Zenshin' fits well for an Acura/Honda NSX-based sports car. Imagine this; because it's an addon car you've said, if I want to download and install this, then I will indeed adding it as a new car with the filenames kept to be called 'Zenshin' BUT the Infernus needs to go first. I can't have two different NA1 NSXs in-game, where one is an ugly duckling, while the other one (which is this one) is a beautiful swan. Not gonna make this as a full Infernus replacement to better retain the name 'Zenshin' in its filenames, especially this even got tuning parts, not gonna happen.

My premise on an Infernus replacement when this Zenshin exist is one should retain the 'Infernus' name BUT CAN'T be based on a NSX anymore. Maybe a Lamborghini Countach-esque one like those in Vice City and Vice City Stories? (despite Rockstar went with the name 'Torero' for the HD Universe counterpart)

@throwaway4732834832 - Full stop, just stop, names don't really matter. You just don't get the meaning of these lore-friendly cars. As long names were 100% generically free-to-use for lore-friendly content, it's fine because everything is UNRELATED.

@Hardtopper - Sorry, bro, but can't you see that user you're replying has been bullying a lot of lore-friendly vehicle modders in the past, and even spamming a bunch of car request to users who're against requests/commissions in their part-time modding life? Ignore them. If they keep not listening, I'm sure there will be a user reporting them to the admin/moderators.

@throwaway4732834832 - No, no, NO, sorry, we won't accept that, Cimol is indeed making a mistake here. The "Other" category IS the correct one due to this IS a lore-friendly vehicle. Surprised that you're not blocked yet, which you should, since you don't listen to what both Tbg_v10 and Sauin8s9h0ine21 have said in their previous replies to your previous posts.

@Cimol - Please ignore and report Throwaway4732834832; they don't really understand how fictional lore-friendly vehicles work and they're very annoying. Lore-friendly vehicles like this should belong to the "Other" category because it's not a licensed vehicle, just ask Alex right now to put this thing on that said category properly so it can live alongside the other fictional lore-friendly vehicles.

If someone like that Throwaway-named user attempt to insult your work (or even cancel you), please ignore and report them. Do whatever you feel like to post, and the community will more happier on what you've done for. If you made a mistake on posting, like that wrong brand categorization I've pointed out, that can be still fixed by editing at your own will or ask the admin/moderators of this site for a correction.

Seeing this situation from that user makes me wonder that Alex should've add a new category called "Lore-friendly cars" for vehicles like this in the 'Cars' sub-section of every GTA game section, so that problem should be solved fast.

@throwaway4732834832 - Shut the hell up, will ya'? I'm with @Katana bs to agree that your insults to fictional lore-friendly vehicles is very annoying, full stop.

@ANDRES170 - You're misleading to that user, please ignore and report Throwaway4732834832, they're very annoying when it comes to these fictional vehicles. Despite Tbg_v10's helpful post (see comments of OniK's 1992 Dinka Jester) about fictional vehicles, which something I'm much more praised, that so-called Throwaway user choose to ignore Tbg's advice, only wanting to control whatever any user wants to post about their mod. As if it gets even worst, I heard they've been spamming a lot of pointless car requests to multiple users, including those who don't accept requests/commissions, which really hurts the community a lot.

If someone like that Throwaway-named user attempt to insult your work (or even cancel you), please ignore and report them. Just do whatever you want and whatever you feel like, as long it's fun. At the end, the community will continue to praise you a lot.